No. 22-7905
IFP
Tags: cell-phone-location co-defendant criminal-procedure due-process evidence-admissibility expert-witness fair-trial jury-instructions police-testimony scientific-reliability witness-testimony
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can a court allow unsupported opinion evidence from a police officer, who does not hold a higher science-engineering degree, about a novel cell phone location (pings) that is not validated as reliable, as expert witness testimony thus violating U.S. Supreme Court's right to due process and a fair trial?
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 31, 2023)
Attorneys
Tikisha Upshaw
Tikisha Upshaw — Petitioner