No. 22-7901
Samuel Howard v. Renee Baker, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: conflict-of-interest criminal-defense criminal-procedure habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance judicial-inquiry legal-representation prejudice right-to-counsel sixth-amendment
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Is the Sixth Amendment violated when a defendant is forced to accept representation by lawyers who se supervisor have a longstanding social and familial relationship with the victim and wh ose colleague openly wish es to see their client executed, despite timely requests for substitution by the attorneys and the defendant ?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Sixth-Amendment-violation
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-07-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-28
Waiver of right of respondent Renee Baker to respond filed.
2023-06-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 31, 2023)
2023-04-28
Application (22A947) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until July 21, 2023.
2023-04-26
Application (22A947) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 22, 2023 to July 21, 2023, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Renee Baker
Gerri L Hardcastle — Nevada Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Samuel Howard
Jonah Joshua Horwitz — Federal Defender Services of ldaho, Petitioner