No. 22-7897
IFP
Tags: 28-usc-2244 eighth-amendment federal-petition habeas-corpus intellectual-disability retroactivity substantive-rule teague-v-lane
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Was Hall v. Florida, 572 U.S. 701 (2014) necessarily "made retroactive," for purposes of authorizing a successive federal habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2)(A), by announcing a rule that substantively expanded the class of individuals who qualify as intellectually disabled under the Eighth Amendment?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was Hall v. Florida necessarily 'made retroactive' for purposes of authorizing a successive federal habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2)(A)?
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-08-07
Waiver of the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition pursuant to Rule 15.5 filed by petitioner.
2023-08-07
Reply of petitioner Frank Walls filed. (Distributed)
2023-07-31
Brief of respondent Florida in opposition filed.
2023-06-26
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.
Attorneys
Frank Walls
Sean Talmage Gunn — Federal Public Defender, N.D. Fla., Petitioner
State of Florida