No. 22-7887
Kevin W. Dunigan v. Raybon C. Johnson, Warden, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the 6th Circuit abused its discretion in denying the plaintiffs' request for preliminary injunctive relief
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2023-08-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-07-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-06-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 28, 2023)
Attorneys
Kevin W. Dunigan
Kevin W. Dunigan — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent