No. 22-7864
Tommy Lee Hubbard, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circumstantial-evidence civil-rights controlled-substance controlled-substances due-process federal-courts hemp legal-interpretation marijuana marijuana-classification thc-threshold
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
Can the federal courts rely exclusively upon circumstantial evidence to decide that a marijuana substance is illegal, when the circumstances surrounding use of illegal marijuana are identical to the circumstances surrounding use of legal marijuana?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can the federal courts rely exclusively upon circumstantial evidence to decide that a marijuana substance is illegal, when the circumstances surrounding use of illegal marijuana are identical to the circumstances surrounding use of legal marijuana?
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-07-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2023-06-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 26, 2023)
Attorneys
Tommy Lee Hubbard, Jr.
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent