No. 22-7846
Vance Collins v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: bruton-v-united-states codefendant codefendant-statement confrontation-clause crawford-v-washington criminal-procedure hearsay out-of-court-statement sixth-amendment
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a defendant's rights under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment are violated by the admission of a non-testifying codefendant's out-of-court statement where references to the defendant are either deleted or replaced with neutral pronouns, but the statement still facially incriminates the defendant due to surrounding context.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a defendant's rights under the Confrontation Clause are violated by the admission of a non-testifying codefendant's out-of-court statement
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-06-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 24, 2023)
2023-04-19
Application (22A912) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until June 19, 2023.
2023-04-18
Application (22A912) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 19, 2023 to June 18, 2023, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Vance Collins
Eric R Breslin — Duane Morris LLP, Petitioner