1. After reviewing the 6 written objections filed as Bills of Proscription in the 49 page Brief For Petitioner filed with the Habeas Corpus, would a jurist of reason believe the Petitioner was denied his Fourteenth Amendment not due process right to a Fundamentally Fair criminal proceeding?

2. Does the act the Petitioner had to file written objections prove the trial Judge refused to allow the Petitioner to raise the constitutional violations to the

3. Would a jurist of reason find the Civil Docket for this case, proves the District Court Clerk erred by failing to issue the November 15th, 2021 Termination of Order and the report and recommendation for this case as required under 28 USCA § 45 (c) Clerk's Duties?

4. Would a jurist of reason find it hard to believe the District Court Clerk issued the report and recommendation on November 15th, 2021 as required by 28 USCA § 45(c) Clerk's Duties, and failed to mail the report and recommendation until November 16th, 2021 violating 28 USCA § 45 (c) Clerk's Duties?

5. Would a jurist of reason believe the South Carolina Department Of Corrections Mail Delivery log which shows the only thing received from the District Court, between November 15th, 2021 and November 20, 2021 was his report and recommendation for case Numbers 0:10-cv-0374-TLWZ No wo 6630?

6. Would a jurist of reason believe the Civil Docket For Case Numbers 1:05:2:0-cv-03253-TLWZ No. 12-6630 which shows the report and recommendation for that case was mailed to the Petitioner on November 16th, 2021?

7. Would a jurist of reason think the United States District Court, Division of Rock Hill should have recused themself from this case and the cases stemming from it, because they work with the Defendants and charity basis and the City of Rock Hill is liable for the five Rock Hill Police Officers in their official capacity?

8. Would a jurist of reason find the Police reports in the 49 page Brief For Petitioner filed with the Habeas Corpus proves the 5 Police Officers withheld a Fourth Amendment right without probable cause?

9. Would a jurist of reason think the Police reports in the 44 page Brief for Petitioner filed with the Habeas Corpus proves the Police Officers conspired to obtain a search warrant, using illegally obtained perjured cause from a warrantless illegal search?

10. Would a jurist of reason think the Police reports proves everything in this case is the poisonous Fruit from a warrantless invasion of privacy?

11. Would a jurist of reason think the letter dated October 22nd, 2020 from the York County Clerk of Court's Office in the 49 page Brief For Petitioner proves the York County Clerk of Courts Office denied the Petitioners Sixth Amendment right to subpoena and cross-examine 4 States witnesses 5 days before the Preliminary Hearing?

12. Can anyone trust a Court record when the Clerk of Court became a party in the case?

13. Would a jurist of reason think the Sixth Amendment violation cited in question 11 also denied the Petitioner's Fourteenth Amendment due process right to a Fundamentally Fair criminal proceeding?

14. Would a jurist of reason think the

Whether the district court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims for lack of standing