No. 22-7836
Tony Michael Julien v. Oklahoma
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure court-authority criminal-law criminal-prosecution due-process ignorance-of-law jurisdiction legal-maxim procedural-law retroactive time-limitation
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Can the passage of time retroactively confer jurisdiction on a court that did not and does not otherwise have jurisdiction?
2. Does the legal maxim early established by this court in Lambert v. California, 355 U.S. 225 (1957), that ignorance of the law is not an excuse in criminal prosecutions apply equally to both parties or is it to be applied solely to the defendant?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can the mere passage of time retroactively confer jurisdiction on a court that did not and does not otherwise have jurisdiction?
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 21, 2023)
Attorneys
Tony Julien
Tony Michael Julien — Petitioner