/\ppe//<-tbS Cbor'C drr id
i'Ae /jtp^icA Ctvrd-^ fi)e.cf do/t./- jQM -tie
fit fiD t) t M.}dj
<?*. Q\4r peHH ox«A "AWBr 6o.y uokt/i, k&
o-f- po$$}b coa ti-f tof-'hn<i/ cl <k} u (pa„ye.
H p<Krn^cipf 3 se**tyiLC 3- Qrdtty dc&td 3 -?~ <3 3 J
fit ftp tndiU A)<>

3, Did fih Ctord drtko) hjl
tc^tstfidb l& /a ■{-tracts / "X ptiidhritD-j?
%f(k\)op T

/, b)d pelWotiu £<{.)I fo 9i°&e Ci c. 7t
*ddi J}fd dlt Appa/i^lde Coord Cfip- ift
Appthd-M-md &f- Ctu/1 7>

Whether the Appellate Court erred by affirming the district court's decision to deny petitioner's constitutional claims