1. Can Major League Baseball ban a natural substance that is required for
humans to survive?

2. Can Major League Baseball selectively enforce it's banned substance
policy to allow certain parties to consume, promote, distribute, and/or sponsor
the very same natural animal-derived product that they have represented to
courts, the media, and in their banned substance policy as prohibited?

3. Did the lower courts err in deciding that a natural substance, commonly
found in all animal products, be considered a drug?

4. Can a union ban a similarly situated individual from meeting with or
communicating with union members in public or private settings?

5. Did the lower courts err in not allowing a Pro Se Plaintiff the ability to
amend his Complaint even a single time?

6. Did the Fifth Circuit err in sanctioning a Pro Se Plaintiff where he had the
right to appeal and matters were not clear to the lower court?

Can Major League Baseball ban a natural substance that is required for humans to survive?