No. 22-7796
Jose Alfredo Perez v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion appellate-review case-specific-facts criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing district-court due-process fifth-circuit sentencing-guidelines sentencing-variance upward-variance
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a district court's mere recitation of the sentencing statute absent any application of case-specific facts is sufficient to support a five-year upward variance.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a district court's mere recitation of the sentencing statute absent any application of case-specific facts is sufficient to support a five-year upward variance
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-06-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 17, 2023)
Attorneys
Jose Alfredo Perez
Erik A. Hanshew — Office of Federal Public Defender (TXWD), Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent