No. 22-7777

Saria Walker v. R. Castriotta, et al.

Lower Court: South Carolina
Docketed: 2023-06-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights conflict-of-interest constitutional-rights due-process judicial-bias rule-interpretation standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)

1.) Why is the Constitution " Right To Due Process " NOT being Upheld ?

2.) Why is Rule 221(b) Not being Upheld in the South Carolina Court Of Appeals ?

3.) Why was the issue concerning Conflict of interest and motion to Disqualify not enforced before Judgment Oct 3,2022 ?

4.) Why is Judicial Bias and misconduct being upheld ?

5.) Why was the issue concerning the Conflict of interest of Greenville county clerk not being taken into consideration ?

6.) Why would South Carolina Court of Appeals Remitte a cases back to lower Courts ?

7.) Why is the law being used as a weapon against me but Not atool to protect me and my rights as it's intended to do ?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Why is the Constitution ~~ Right To Due Process ' NOT being Upheld ?

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-07-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-28
Waiver of right of respondent The Carlonia Center for Behavioral Health to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2023-05-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 13, 2023)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of ServiceMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Saria Walker
Saria Walker — Petitioner
The Carlonia Center for Behavioral Health
Christopher R. McKeown — Richardson Plowden Robinson, P.A., Respondent