No. 22-7755
Jerome Williams v. United States
IFP
Tags: armed-career-criminal-act career-offender categorical-approach circuit-split controlled-substance federal-sentencing-guidelines mcneill-precedent mcneill-v-united-states sentencing-guidelines state-drug-laws
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does McNeill require courts to define "controlled substance" under §§ 4B1.1 and 4B1.2 of the federal sentencing guidelines by consulting superseded state schedules that had been in effect at the time of a prior state conviction?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does McNeill require courts to define 'controlled substance' under §§ 4B1.1 and 4B1.2 of the federal sentencing guidelines by consulting superseded state schedules that had been in effect at the time of a prior state conviction?
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-08-21
Reply of petitioner Jerome Williams filed.
2023-08-11
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2023-07-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 11, 2023.
2023-07-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 12, 2023 to August 11, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-06-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 12, 2023)
Attorneys
Jerome Williams
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent