I. Whether Congress Lacked Congressional Authority Under the Commerce Clause (1505 U.S.C.) To Enact Statutes With the Intent That A Ton Page In Conviction Sex Acts

II. Whether This Court Should Use Its Supervisory Authority Pursuant To McCormick v. U.S., 500 U.S. 257 (1991) And Ruan v. U.S. 193 S.Ct. 3370 To Invalidate the Blind Cite Definition Enunciated 9 In U.S. v. Iaw (at 1991 (2010) And Its Application MB For the first Time on Appellate Applied)

III. A Petition Governing MQR Affording Precedent Opinion In U.S. v. Fulkerson 03393 U.S. (5) 75 Fhb-banerkKSgSmT

IV. Whether This Court Should Use Its Supervisory Authority To Reverse State Court And the Whole Circuit, Resolved To Apply This

1. Whether the District Court And The Ninth Circuit Failure To Address Petitioners Claim In His 28 U.S.C. §2055 Motion at Appellate Counsels On Direct-Appeal Rendered (BCC)

2. Whether This Court Should Use Its Supervisory Authority To Determine If The Certificate Of Appealability (COA) Should Be Expanded To Encompass Any of The Claims Raised In The 2255 Motion That Makes A Substantial Showing of A Denial A Constitutional Right

Whether Congress Lacked Congressional Authority Under The Commerce Clause