No. 22-7740

Chelsea Shannon McIntyre v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-06-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: career-offender criminal-procedure due-process judicial-discretion policy predicate-convictions sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)

Did Ms. McIntyre receive due process of law where the district
applie d Care er Offender Guide lines, lacking a sound basis in policy,
and leading to a career offender designation that was base d on
insufficie ntly substantial predicat e convictions?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did Ms. McIntyre receive due process of law where the district applied Career Offender Guidelines, lacking a sound basis in policy, and leading to a career offender designation that was based on insufficiently substantial predicate convictions?

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-06-06

Attorneys

Chelsea McIntyre
Andrea Renee St. JulianLaw Offices of Andrea Renee St. Julian, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent