No. 22-7740
Chelsea Shannon McIntyre v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: career-offender criminal-procedure due-process judicial-discretion policy predicate-convictions sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did Ms. McIntyre receive due process of law where the district
applie d Care er Offender Guide lines, lacking a sound basis in policy,
and leading to a career offender designation that was base d on
insufficie ntly substantial predicat e convictions?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did Ms. McIntyre receive due process of law where the district applied Career Offender Guidelines, lacking a sound basis in policy, and leading to a career offender designation that was based on insufficiently substantial predicate convictions?
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-06-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 10, 2023)
Attorneys
Chelsea McIntyre
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent