No. 22-7739
Robert L. Swinton, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 2nd-amendment brady-v-maryland brady-violation due-process firearms-statute jurisdiction speedy-trial standing tenth-amendment witness-impeachment
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment DueProcess Securities
SecondAmendment DueProcess Securities
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Is 18.U.S.C. § 922(g) constitutional and was Tenth Amendment jurisdiction maintained for firearms alleged in this case?
2. Was this a violation of Brady v. Maryland, and was the petitioner afforded Due Process of Law, Effective Counsel and a Speedy Trial?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) constitutional and was Tenth Amendment jurisdiction maintained for firearms alleged in this case?
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-06-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 10, 2023)
Attorneys
Robert Swinton
Robert Lee Swinton — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent