Whether the Fifth Circuit Erred in Denying Araujo's Motion for Certificate of Appealability ("COA") Because He Did Reprise His Grounds from His Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody ("§ 2255") and He Has Made a Substantial Showing of the Denial of a Constitutional Right Because Jurists of Reason Could Disagree with the District Court's and Appellate Court's Resolution of His Constitutional Claims or Jurists Could Conclude the Issues Presented Are Adequate to Deserve Encouragement to Proceed Further.

Whether the Fifth Circuit Erred in Denying Araujo's Motion for Certificate of Appealability