No. 22-7711
William Jon Patric Ebert v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process evidence evidence-admissibility fourth-circuit prior-bad-acts rule-404(b) rule-404b sixth-circuit united-states-v-stout
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT ERRED IN AFFIRMING THE DISTRICT COURT'S RULING TO ADMIT EVIDENCE OF THE APPELLANT'S PRIOR BAD ACTS OR CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF RULE 404(b) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE IN CONTRADICTION TO THE SIXTH CIRCUIT OPINION OF United States v. Stout, 509 F.3d 796, 799 (6th Cir. 2007).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit erred in affirming the district court's ruling to admit evidence of the appellant's prior bad acts or conduct in violation of Rule 404(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-05-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 5, 2023)
Attorneys
William Jon Patric Ebert
Samuel Bayness Winthrop — Winthrop & Gaines Messick, PLLC, Petitioner