No. 22-7703
Jacob Patrick Krafft v. United States
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing due-process presumption-of-reasonableness sentencing-guidelines substantive-reasonableness within-guidelines-sentence
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
How does a court of appeals determine whether a defendant has rebutted the presumption of reasonableness when the defendant is challenging the substantive reasonableness of a within-Guidelines sentence?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
How does a court of appeals determine whether a defendant has rebutted the presumption of reasonableness when the defendant is challenging the substantive reasonableness of a within-Guidelines sentence?
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2023-06-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 5, 2023)
Attorneys
Jacob Patrick Krafft
Kristin L. Davidson — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent