No. 22-7698
Tristan Kareem Davis v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law appointments-clause civil-rights constitutional-interpretation due-process executive-power senate-confirmation sentencing sixth-amendment statutory-maximum tenth-amendment territorial-governance
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the Court exceed its authority in not having a jury at the sentencing hearing to sentence Davis beyond the Statutory Maximum?
Is the United States in violation of the Tenth Amendment by bringing charges against Davis?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court exceeded its authority by not having a jury at the sentencing hearing to sentence Davis beyond the statutory maximum
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-05-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 3, 2023)
Attorneys
Tristan K. Davis
Tristan Kareem Davis — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent