1. Whether the Government violated Mr. Harriman's Sixth and Eighth Amendment Constitution al Eights and suppress evidentiary material of exculpatory value from the Discovery pro duced to the Defense thus committing a Brady Violation?

2. Whether Mr: Harriman's Trial counsel and Appellate Counsel did violate Mr. Harriman's Sixth Amendment Rights and fail to provide adequate counsel on his behalf and meet the standard as being Ineffective Assistance of Counsel?

3. Whether the District Court violated Mr. Harriman's Sixth >and Eighth Amendment.-Constit- utional Rights, as.well as his Rights to Due Process in accordance of the Federal Rules and Procedure on several issues .and abuse its judicial discretion? (1) Was Mr. Harriman's Rights \dolated when the District Court denied Mr. Harriman's request for new counsel TWO seperate occassions prior to his trial? (2) Were Mr. Harriman's rights violated by the court repeatedly denying Mr. Harriman to have access to his discovery in his :^:in preparing his appeal? (3) whether the court abused its discretion and violated the Rights Mr. Harriman is due and denying him the right to an Evidentiary Hearing and Counsel to be appointed due to the complexities of the issues and to gather evidentiary items Mr. Harriman couldn't while incarcerated in prison, when more then Meeting the burden and showing cause to have his claim viewed and investigated in greater detail by the court?

whether-the-government-violated-constitutional-rights