Nathaniel R. Webb v. Director Butler, et al.
1. Did the deferdants vote the US. Constitutional proections afforded to marital relationships by imposing a blanket loan of all forms oon onit ?
2. Did the defendants blanket ban on spousal communication vidate establish a unitied coordenated defense?
3. Did the defendants Jail Mad Watch List vioate the Us. Constitetinal protections of unfettered communication through the warrantless opereng, reding, photocopying, and providing * of all of plairti' coples incoming and outgoing u.s. Mail to third parties which included investigators and a prosecutor.
4. Does mal have an uncarcerated pro se itigant's legal protected status? If so, did the defendants vidate the U.S. Constitution through he warrantess opening, rading, horcpi and providing eopues f peintif incoming outgoing U.S. Mail pro contairning eg ma c se and the o opposing prosecutor?
Did the defendants violate the U.S. Constitutional protections related to marital relationships by imposing a blanket ban on spousal communication for over two years, even though all forms of communication were monitored for security purposes?