No. 22-7643

Nathaniel R. Webb v. Director Butler, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-05-25
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights communication-monitoring constitutional-rights due-process family-law fourth-amendment incarceration marriage privacy-violation spousal-communication unauthorized-access
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Did the deferdants vote the US. Constitutional proections afforded to marital relationships by imposing a blanket loan of all forms oon onit ?

2. Did the defendants blanket ban on spousal communication vidate establish a unitied coordenated defense?

3. Did the defendants Jail Mad Watch List vioate the Us. Constitetinal protections of unfettered communication through the warrantless opereng, reding, photocopying, and providing * of all of plairti' coples incoming and outgoing u.s. Mail to third parties which included investigators and a prosecutor.

4. Does mal have an uncarcerated pro se itigant's legal protected status? If so, did the defendants vidate the U.S. Constitution through he warrantess opening, rading, horcpi and providing eopues f peintif incoming outgoing U.S. Mail pro contairning eg ma c se and the o opposing prosecutor?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the defendants violate the U.S. Constitutional protections related to marital relationships by imposing a blanket ban on spousal communication for over two years, even though all forms of communication were monitored for security purposes?

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-23
Waiver of right of respondent Director Butler, et al. to respond filed.
2023-05-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 26, 2023)

Attorneys

Director Butler, et al.
J. Nicholas EllisPoyner & Spruill L.L.P., Respondent
Nathaniel R. Webb
Nathaniel R. Webb — Petitioner