I. The Post-Lowviction Court Mawifestly Erred By Denying
Hulow Versers Posh-Lonviction Pedition ASter Aw Evidentiary
Hearing, Where fl, Lamphell's Testimony Was Newly Discovery
Evdewce Df Verser's Actual Inwocence. The Court Rubia
Lowsists Bf Frreveous Factual Findings.

TE. Whether This Lourt Shosld Drder A Remand For Further
Proceedings Whese Pos}-Cowvictiow Louwsel Rendered Unreasonable
Assistance Iw Failing To Litigate Versers Llsin At She Qexewd
Stage In Fresenting Versers Motiv To Suppress Evidewee Rased
pow Au Uvlawlu) Arrest: Trial Lout's Misapplication OF State
Pules Aud Laws. Lowsidesing Faclrs Alteuuated Tacha The
Frosevee Dr Absence DG Miranda Warwing.

Whether the post-conviction court erred in denying the petitioner's post-conviction petition after an evidentiary hearing, where the newly discovered evidence of the witness's testimony demonstrated the petitioner's actual innocence