Whether the United States Supreme Court should order the use of a deference doctrine (referred to as "Headman Deference" outlined in this petition) that sets forth Chevron deference-type tests which must be applied to all lower-court actions seeking to impose alimony-related servitude upon a citizen in the absence of a written pre-nuptial agreement.

Whether (1) a disregard of a demand for trial by jury; (2) a refusal to issue declaratory judgements defining the legal relationship between parties and their rights in a matter before the court; (3) threats of or actual ordering of jail time; (4) the issuance of bill-of-attainder-type labels; and/or (5) interpretations of legal terms contrary to their legal meaning or similar denials of due process; without the existence of a pre-nuptial agreement before imposing alimony servitude, constitutes court coercion into involuntary-alimony servitude in violation of the Thirteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution.

Whether any Court Officer, who participates in the imposition of alimony in excess of one-year without the existence of a pre-nuptial agreement, imposing terms of alimony servitude in excess of one year, without applying the Headman Deference test, shall be guilty of criminal "knowingly and willfully" holding a person in involuntary servitude in violation of Title 18, U.S.C., Sec. 1584 Sale into involuntary servitude.

Whether any employer or other party, who does not apply Headman Deference before imposing terms of servitude against an individual's will, shall be deemed to "obstruct[], attempt[] to obstruct, or in any way interfere[] with or prevent[] the enforcement of" Title 18, U.S.C., Sec. 1584 Sale into involuntary servitude and shall be subject to being "fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or life, or both".

Whether the Supreme Court should order the use of a 'Headman Deference' doctrine for alimony-related servitude