Should the Court grant a writ of certiorari, vacate the judgment below, and remand this case for the Ninth Circuit to consider this Court's intervening decision in Reed v. Goertz, 143 S. Ct. 955 (2023), which held that the federal statute of limitations for filing a federal claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 does not run until potentially dispositive state litigation is final?

In the alternative, under the reasoning of Reed v. Goertz, 143 S. Ct. 955 (2023), does the one-year statute of limitations under 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)(4) commence only when state court proceedings resolving a question of state law necessary to the defendant's federal constitutional claim have been finally resolved on appeal?

Whether the one-year statute of limitations under 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f) for filing a federal habeas petition commenced when the state trial court denied relief or when the state appellate proceedings concluded