1. DOES THE LOWER COURT'S DECISION DENYING
PETITIONER'S CLAIM (THAT THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN
STRIKING A PROSPECTIVE JUROR ABSENT A SUFFICIENT
RACE-NEUTRAL AND GENUINE REASON) VIOLATE THE
EQUAL PROTECTION PROVISIONS OF THE UNITED STATES
CONSTITUTION ACCORDING TO THE NEIL/BATSON TEST
AS ANNUNCIATED BY THE UNITED STATES SUPREME
COURT IN PURKETT v. ELEM., 115 S.Ct. 1769 (1995)?

2. DOES THE LOWER COURT'S DECISION ALLOWING THE
TRIAL COURT TO PROVIDE RACE-NEUTRAL REASONS (FOR
THE BENEFIT OF THE STATE) IN STRIKING A
PROSPECTIVE JUROR VIOLATE THE UNITED STATES
CONSTITUTION IN LIGHT OF THE UNITED STATES
SUPREME COURT DECISION IN WILLIAMS v. LOUISIANA,
136 S.Ct. 2156 (2016)?

3. DOES THE LOWER COURTS DECISION DENYING
PETITIONER'S GIGLIO CLAIM (THAT THE PROSECUTOR
ELICITED PERJURED TESTIMONY FROM THE VICTIM)
VIOLATE THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE
FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT AS ANNUNCIATED BY THE
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT DECISION IN NAPUE v.
ILLINOIS, 79 8.Ct. 1173 (1959)?

Whether the lower court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims for violation of their First Amendment rights