Mark Ringland v. United States
))KDu't PrOCt&J C//9U6 £ 0 7^ Pjl€- /'0r~f'(ft€AJ /JPA-CtodsWr/O^ ■
UJhe-}htr UAJptr Du<t Ptotted v/Jp ptoitcb iom C/rfuzc 5
op Jht Pbr'th^tl/A' yP/lA^pM *A/p 0 p -/-hz 40CV5&J , P/liO forP/ife'CAU
prdvtp-ez Out PraC^PJ ' /?aj<P e^o^/poro A^cpP 0yU }
ThoP Aj& sPj-Pc 5hj// m/?Dt or CA>porct JPy Plu tuhAcP 5^4 D
/!bt'ujcjY, f/it priv/lt(jt*> or t'ntAiu^fP 1^^ op eri^-c/us oP dpt,
Uaj, Prof pid'D'# , A40C hpP 4<vy $ f/p-ft, p-€fr i'sjc o/uoj p-cOSOAJ
fifr j /< bxritj f#r ptoptricf, L^iphoop Jo e proc-r^J oP ih* UtOj
AJO 0pt™ ij fe ./pfiJt* p'irSOvO UJ/fJvP Dp6 j'uf'Po/DcpDo^/ l¥lO 0OU4-J
Pjir A/?UU?.or
a P
pro 4-eoP/ryt/ o
Tkt, PotnPf) Pot/O /}AA-etVOf/)A-c/v Vp(0\/DA 06 /
Whether the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment provide that no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States, or shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law