1. Petitioner was denied due process in U.S. Court Of Appeals, For The
for Extension of Time, in reply to 9th Circuit in Form 14. Motion:
this 9th Circuit's Time Schedule Order-court filed 7-12-21.

2. As related to above above item #1, Petitioner requested "?rief" in
"Response", "requested new due date",which was signed/dated 7-14-21, the
via USPS on 7-14-21, which had "7-12-21" same date Petitioner rec'd
Neopost date with zip 94103 from Clerk,for 9th Circuit, zip 94119-3939.

3. As related to above item #s 1. & 2.* "The parfc^esshall meet the follow
ing time schedule". "Tue., 9-7-21", "Failure of the appellant to comply
with the Time Schedule Order will result in automatic dismissal of the
appeal". Petitioner has not rec'd any further 9th Circuit filing)s)
since its last dated 7-12-21. The 9th circuit errored in not providing
its reply to above "Form 14." "Motion for Extension of Time" & that
"denied" Petitioner's right to "due process".

4. As related to above item #1. 2. & 3., by denjjrinq"due process", the 9th
Circuit's "automatice dismissal, on its face-Unconstitutional as well
as rendering the Bill of Rights a meaningless judicial process under
the Rule of Law. The parent of the foregoing,factual prevailing &
mitigating circumstance (s),in the Declaration of Independence, another
casualty in the judicial process under the Rule of Law, too!!!

5. The public's trust, confidence & faith in the U.S. Supreme Court must
not be ■■^compromised by not having a court hearing toddtermine whether
the 9th Circuit did in deed "deny" this above "due process". The Justices
of the U.S. Supreme Court know, our judiciik 1 process under- the Rule of
Law-today is at a crossroad)s )-historically , whereas a civil division
of equal portion)s) currently exists, undisputable fact!!!

6. Whether the original/or otherwise of the Constitution
intent/ '
a U.S. Supreme Court or any court,there can not be
any Rule that's fixed-not subject
to a discretionary exception, especially not applicable as a
discrimination, because open to other(s) not just one single set or
otherwise circumstance(s ) for "a discretionary exception!!! This case
meets this criterion, beyondd the 9th Circuit's "automatic dismissal"
due,to factual prevailing & mitgating circumstance (s), as
addressed,in Petitioner's signature & date of this Motion For leave To
Proceed IN FORMA PAUPERIS with attched Petitiondate,
For A Writ Of Certiorari

7. The Petitioner being a permanent, physically disabled person under ADA of
1990 & side-effects from Rxs in the foregoing & having a Dyslexia
condition & COVID-19 circumstance(s) &
Cardiac death",at"risk for worsening
establishes as evidence in

Whether the 9th Circuit denied due process in dismissing the petitioner's appeal