No. 22-7542

Wilber Curtis Johnson v. Texas

Lower Court: Texas
Docketed: 2023-05-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: confrontation-clause constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence federal-constitution sexual-assault texas-constitution trial-procedure witness-testimony
Key Terms:
Immigration
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether testimony can be sufficient to render harmless any error in admitting additional testimony in evidence, when trial counsel objected to testimony and when the record suggests testimony was not properly admitted and violate due process; the confrontation clause under both the United States and Texas Constitution in addition to due course of law.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether testimony can be sufficient to render harmless any error in admitting additional testimony as evidence, when trial counsel objected to testimony and when the record suggests testimony was not properly admitted and violate due process and the confrontation clause under both the United States and Texas Constitution in addition to due course of law

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-05-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 12, 2023)

Attorneys

Wilber Johnson
Wilber Curtis Johnson — Petitioner