Wilber Curtis Johnson v. Texas
Immigration
Whether testimony can be sufficient to render harmless any error in admitting additional testimony in evidence, when trial counsel objected to testimony and when the record suggests testimony was not properly admitted and violate due process; the confrontation clause under both the United States and Texas Constitution in addition to due course of law.
Whether testimony can be sufficient to render harmless any error in admitting additional testimony as evidence, when trial counsel objected to testimony and when the record suggests testimony was not properly admitted and violate due process and the confrontation clause under both the United States and Texas Constitution in addition to due course of law