No. 22-7541
Luis Nunez-Romero v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 8-usc-1229 administrative-law due-process immigration-law immigration-removal notice-to-appear removal-order removal-proceedings statutory-interpretation ultra-vires
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Environmental DueProcess Securities Immigration
AdministrativeLaw Environmental DueProcess Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-06-08
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a putative notice to appear that does not contain the time and place of removal proceedings, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1229(a)(1)(G), is ultra vires, and if so, whether the resulting removal order is ultra vires.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a putative notice to appear that does not contain the time and place of removal proceedings, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1229(a)(1)(G), is ultra vires, and if so, whether the resulting removal order is ultra vires
Docket Entries
2023-06-12
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/8/2023.
2023-05-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2023-05-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 12, 2023)
Attorneys
Luis Nunez-Romero
Tamara Crepet — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent