No. 22-7533
Terence Crawley v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3582 civil-rights compassionate-release criminal-procedure discretionary-relief district-court-discretion due-process first-step-act non-frivolous-arguments sentencing sentencing-relief supreme-court-ruling
Latest Conference:
2023-06-08
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the district court is obligated to consider a defendant's non-frivolous arguments in exercising its discretion to grant relief in a motion for a reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 USC § 3582(c) in light of this Court's ruling in Concepcion v. United States.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court is obligated to consider a defendant's non-frivolous arguments when exercising its discretion to grant or deny relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)
Docket Entries
2023-06-12
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/8/2023.
2023-05-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-05-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 12, 2023)
Attorneys
Terence Crawley
Terence Crawley — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent