(1) whether the yuo vecds to be ua mous, tv Fide on elemats that are the causation oF de PAWATIOn UNVEZ IDUSC 2412, and where spect catly wetructinie not ty be wiAWimous on the speanfic act(s) ts

(2) whether a private pertow Can be comvicledl of-1% +(e at prvele peltorn is wot Ache jojtly with @ nublic o Fhaal, awd thatths vs tutiona

(3) whether a~ Comyi chon Stawd where i+ was obthwed False evidence provided by aoNernment poeats And ther Welwesses, Violates Due Froce

(4) whether oO GIVEG ent Na ony Expert Nex Copdltand SUENCE a) gh. w her ' del be ateiY ODFUSCAIES jl Fo ecu pao ty to the Pedetiower is Const tutiwal erro.

Whether the jury needs to be unanimous, to decide on elements that are the causation of deprivation under 18 USC 2412, and whether specifically instructions not to be unanimous on the specific act(s) is constitutional