Noel Thomas v. Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, et al.
Whether the Trial Court erred as a matter of law by dismissing 1)
Petitioner 's case based upon the Lower Court claims that Petitioner failed to
state a claim and the basis for the Court 's jurisdiction and failure to comply
with federal rules of civil procedure, which are all fictitious arguments based
on the fact that Petitioner was in full compliance with all the above-stated
violations.
2) Whether the Trial Court abused its discretion in refusing to review and
examine the complaint and all the supporting exhibits and the denial of the
motion to proceed in forma pauperis, which is a privilege and a right, and
therefore violates constitutional guarantees, such as due process, right to
redress grievances, freedom of speech and access to the court.
Whether the Trial Court erred in dismissing the case