No. 22-7499
Judy Thorpe v. Rosemarie Cipparulo, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-procedure appellate-review civil-procedure court-certification due-process equitable-review judicial-review legal-review manifest-error prejudicial-error trial-court-decision
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether it was manifest error and significantly prejudicial for the Supreme Court of New Jersey to Deny Certification and Not Fairly and Equitably Review the Erroneous Decisions of the Appellate Division and the Trial Court.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether it was manifest error and significantly prejudicial for the Supreme Court of New Jersey to Deny Certification and Not Fairly and Equitably Review the Erroneous Decisions of the Appellate Division and the Trial Court
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-07
Waiver of right of respondent Rosemarie Cipparulo, et al. to respond filed.
2023-03-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 8, 2023)
Attorneys
Judy Thorpe
Judy Thorpe — Petitioner
Rosemarie Cipparulo, et al.
Petar Kuridza — Lewis Brisbois Bisguard & Smith, LLP, Respondent