No. 22-7484

In Re Richard Chapman

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2023-05-08
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-review binding-precedent civil-procedure constitutional-rights court-mandate due-process evidentiary-hearing judicial-discretion record-review standing
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2023-05-25
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether THE TRiAI COUrT AbUSEd itS AUThORiTY
When it Departed From The Appeslate CourT
MAndate In Chapmanl67 S03d1170?

2. Whether THE Appellate CourT Abused its Authority
when it Reexamind.its own decision when
nothing Changed in The Remedd oF Chapman
167 50 3d.1170.?

3. WhetheR The Appellate CourT decision WAs
Binding in The prior Appeal,And must Be
Followed inthe cAse?
Ann 99-39-5(2)?

5. Whether An unsigned Lerter Found wAs enough
evidence To contradict Chapmanclaims?

hearing-tohave his claims Considered on the
merits Based on The Located Record transcrip+?

7. whether chapman have been Deprived of his
Fundamental ConsTiTutional RighTS?

8. Whether Chapman is entitied to Anew trial due
To The Incomplete Record-+ranscRipT?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the trial court abused its authority when it departed from the appellate court mandate

Docket Entries

2023-05-30
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/25/2023.
2023-03-31

Attorneys

Chapman, In Re Richard
Richard Chapman — Petitioner