No. 22-7477
Douglas Manning v. Sgt. St. Paul, et al.
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights culpability damages defendant-rights due-process evidence-interference judicial-discretion legal-standard plaintiff-burden representation standing
Latest Conference:
2024-01-05
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
(aM VW Aefendartis PePre5e/iiai*on 5o P-elaW H He
;haf/flftd ConSecjt'eO^e HHt P/airHf Should
beheld fW rT
oi/liy an W/iHHe l)efeniafiH aaV^) H
(t\ay beOlAJ/ £>
Hr/edere
^f eR^eJ ?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the defendant's representation related to the harmful consequence to the plaintiff that he should be held responsible for?
Docket Entries
2024-01-08
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-11-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-10-18
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-04-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 5, 2023)
Attorneys
Douglas Manning
Douglas Manning — Petitioner