1. Petitioner questions the essence

2. Petitioner questions the lack of finding by the Rehearino of against the Respondent Borough of Allendale for vi Rico~udcs Cecchi third Circuit District Court the inBanc Panel mail fraud, ing, wire fraud, under section 2 Times 18 US code, in or any enterprise mien is comeernon of an unlawful Debt (surplus Taxes) to acauire or maintain, directly any interest in or centre., oi any enterprise which is in the

3. Petitioner questions the violation Rights of Due Process and Ecual Protection for # 2 Above.

4. Petitioner Real estate to U.S.

5. Petitioner questions its absence of Affordable Units now being Constructed in Allendale. respondent Borough of Allendale

6. Petitioner Passaic River Coalition to collect amount of $5,928,680.00 under Lhe filed lien. Notice of Lis Pendens, Deed Description of Judge Misen ana Writ of Execution filed under J-061371-13. questions tne violation of respondent John Albohm deny recovery of the 2.5 for the writ of Execution and filed lien Robert C.

7. Petionerto acres owned by Judgment debtor Jack Levin as stated in #6 above. Pct^-tioner quesucns tne aosence of any decision by Judae Cecchi under Third Circuit application in Pei.i j. s Cons u11utionai rights under Due Process Protection, support of the and Equal

8. Petitioner questions the lack of decision of the Court and the Appellate Courts to rule Decision in Sniadach v Family Finance Corp. 3S5 U.S. Peuuiouei ydesiiOns wny judge Ceccfti and the En Banc Panel 54:4-1 Franklin Bank vs Parker 136 NJ Third Circuit on Justice Harlan's 337 (1969)

10. failed to enforce N.J.S.A. Super 476, 346 A 2d 1973.

11. Petitioner Questions the lack of finding of the Bribe by the Emigrants Savings Attorney Richard Epstein who paid two separate payments to the Respondents Bergen County Sheriffs Dept, for non- notxce oi the Sherin ' s sale and the issuance of the Sheriff's Deed, wxtnxn the act or illegal foreclosure upon petitioners home.

12. Petitioner questions the 3rd District Court findings that failed to determine the falsity of the Budget displayed over wire to the explanation of the $43 million in reports which were "no Owner Occupied" residence and or surplus deposits by the CFO Paula Favata.

13. Petitioner questions that both the 3rd Appeal Panel En Banc failed acknowledge or the stolen interest earned illegally District Court and the the Equal Protection clause of the 14th Amendment.

14. Petitionerto decide and the SEC which terminated all

15. Petitioner questions why my Rights under the 14th Amendment to return my share over Petitioners 18 years of ownership and tax payments.

16. Petitioner questions why the 14th Amendment Respondents uc protect me iron in town actions which whenrequires the are illegal Prank Swarth the supervisor of the Water Department Stole $ 1 ars rrom the water Department. The

Absence of decision on Fair Housing Act compliance