No. 22-7474
Quinton Markis Cuthbertson, aka Quinton Marquis Cuthbertson v. United States
IFP
Tags: due-process fourth-amendment police-misconduct police-provocation spoliation subterfuge suppression-hearing unreasonable-seizure
Latest Conference:
2023-10-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Do police violate a person's Fourth Amendment rights against
unreasonable seizure when they provoke, through subterfuge and
intimidation, a person to flee and then rely upon that flight as the basis
for a stop?
2. What remedies should be imposed in a Suppression Hearing for Due
Process and Spoliation violations when material evidence is destroyed or
not preserved?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Do police violate a person's Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable seizure when they provoke, through subterfuge and intimidation, a person to flee and then rely upon that flight as the basis for a stop?
Docket Entries
2023-10-10
Petition DENIED.
2023-09-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2023.
2023-09-01
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2023-07-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 1, 2023.
2023-07-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 4, 2023 to September 1, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-06-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including August 4, 2023.
2023-06-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 5, 2023 to August 4, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-06-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 5, 2023.
2023-06-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 5, 2023 to July 5, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-05-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 5, 2023)
Attorneys
Quinton Markis Cuthbertson
Peter Donald Zellmer — Peter D. Zellmer, PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent