No. 22-7457

Bruce Allen Buckner v. Daniel Porter, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-05-04
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: brady-violation civil-procedure civil-rights civil-stay constitutional-rights criminal-case criminal-procedure due-process judicial-bias obstruction-of-justice stay
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Does a Stay in one civil proceeding pending the outcome of a Criminal case extend to all other civil proceeding stemming from the same Criminal case?

2. Did Magistrate Judge Shiva Hodges err by failing to extend the Stay she granted the Defendants pending the State's criminal case, to the Federal criminal case?

3. Did Senior District Court Judge Terry Wooten and Magistrate Judge Shiva Hodges show prejudice by willfully violating the Stay to protect the Defendants, York County Solicitor, Daniel Porter and York County Clerk and possible criminal charges for failing to do their administrative duties intentionally violating Brady, producing false evidence denying the Petitioner's Sixth Amendment right to subpoena and cross-examine State's witnesses and denying the Petitioner's Fourteenth Amendment due process right to a fundamentally fair criminal proceeding?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does a stay in one civil proceeding pending the outcome of a criminal case extend to all other civil proceedings stemming from the same criminal case?

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-03-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 5, 2023)

Attorneys

Bruce A. Buckner
Bruce A. Buckner — Petitioner