James Conerly, et al. v. Kaiser Permanente, et al.
1. WHETHER, the Ninth Circuit Court "Abused in its Discretion with its
Findings, Recommendations and Judgment/Orders concerning this Case at
hand?
2. WHETHER, the Ninth Circuit Court "Abused in its Discretion in failing to
examine Petitioners* Due Process Issues, and make a Ruling on the Due
Process issues in the case at hand?
3. WHETHER, the Ninth Circuit Court "Abused in its Discretion with Findings,
Recommendations and Judgment/Orders concerning the Prior "Related
Cases?
4. WHETHER, the Ninth Circuit Court "Abused in its Discretion in failing to
examine Petitioners ' Due Process Issues, and make a Ruling on the Due
Process issues in the Prior "Related Cases "?
5. WHETHER, the Ninth Circuit Court "Abused in its Discretion in failing to
examine Petitioners* Systemic Racism Issues in the case at hand?
6. WHETHER, the Ninth Circuit Court "Abused in its Discretion in fading to
examine Petitioners* "Systemic Racism " Issues in the Prior "Related
Cases?
7. WHETHER, the Ninth Circuit Court Abused its Discretion in finding that
Petitioners did not present a case that had "Subject Matter Jurisdiction " in
The Case at Hand?
8. WHETHER, the Ninth Circuit Court Abused its Discretion in finding not
recognizing that Petitioners Cases (Prior Related and Case at Hand were and are
under the Constitutional Questions/Issues before the Federal Court and not Family
Law Resolutions?
9. WHETHER, the issuing of an "Order " that requires a United States Citizen to
refrain from [videotaping in public places] application of his/her Constitutional
Right [under the First Amendment] that is Guaranteed to Petitioners is a
Violation of Petitioners Constitutional Right [under the First Amendment]?
10. WHETHER, "Judicial Immunity " is rightly applicable to a Judicial
Officer who make an Order that when applied, it restricts a citizen from
enjoyment of a Constitutional exercise, that right is properly prohibited by the
Judicial Officer?
11. WHETHER, the Eastern District Court Abused its Discretion by denying
Petitioners Defaults rulings when Respondents failed to Answer
Complaints after having been property served with Summons and Complaint?
12. WHETHER, the Eastern District Court Abused its Discretion by denying
Petitioners Ex Parte Hearings when a need to protect a child in the case at
hand?
Whether the Ninth Circuit Court abused its discretion