Can the Indiana Supreme Court, in violation of both the United States Constitutions, Illinois State Supreme court, and cases decided by this Court, make an exception to those authorities to the uncontroverted allegations made April 2019 in his verified unchallenged complaint that the Respondent sworn law enforcement officer, boasted to a Reporter that he had planted evidence to gain the Petitioner's wrongful conviction, then threatened to kill the Reporter after she made a police report and told other authorities. And after the Petitioner filed suit, the law enforcement officer, his legal counsel, and all other Respondents failed to file anything, in any court denying or controverting this admission of evidence planting, thereby deeming the facts admitted by operation of Indiana law. Indiana Trial Rule 8D. This petition seeks to harmonize the Indiana Supreme Court's decision with the U.S. Constitution, Illinois' State Court of last resort, and 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, and this Court.

The Indiana Supreme Court has decided an important federal question in a way that conflicts with the decisions of another State Court of last resort, Illinois Supreme Court, 1st Circuit United States Court of Appeals, and this Court; and the state court has decided an important federal question in a way that conflicts with relevant decisions of this Court.

Can the Indiana Supreme Court make an exception to the U.S. Constitution, Illinois Supreme Court, and 1st Circuit Court of Appeals decisions regarding deliberate-framing, due-process, police-misconduct, state-constitutional-rights, federalism, wrongful-conviction