The Wisconsin Supreme Court Should Not Have EX PARTE discriminatively continued with the 2018-ongoing DENIALS OF the UNHEARD PETITIONS FILED FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE, INVESTIGATION, POSTCONVICTION RELIEF and PRESENTENCE RELIEF FILED UNDER Wis. Stats. § 901.03(l)(a)(b)(4), 902.01(2)(a)(4-6), 968.26, and 974.06/Coram Nobis for Postconviction Motioning. The Wisconsin Supreme Court Should Have Issued remand for Judicial Notices, Forwarded Investigations, resentencing and/or Voided the 1995-1996 and 2003 Wrongful Criminal Judgments' usage and recognize the Unlawful 2008+2018 PAC .02 Arrests implemented under the ex post facto Implied Consent and PAC .02 Laws underlying the 2018 charges and 2005-2010 sentences.

SECTION-A: Question - whether the court of appeals may deny an otherwise sufficiently pled habeas petition ex parte

Whether the Wisconsin Supreme Court erred in ex parte denying unheard petitions for judicial notice, investigation, post-conviction relief, and presentence relief