No. 22-7407
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance prejudice right-to-counsel trial-strategy
Latest Conference:
2023-05-25
Question Presented (from Petition)
0. UJhdhsr 4te '5 "trial ojfern&Uj
(tetiHlufrmlltj jfie^feo/n/e. C(s5 \sfanc& by jjufsutoj
<3 IWeose-' Prwoca'fldn - Tt'wf tucvs p<*fe/rHi/
Un'kznqbfe art/ d&>meut -/p -£^|Raax?|er<a^
c3), IpIleHwr ~fh& ^r\a// A4)e "i nopropor (<j
4t> \As<hW' p&^d'oeirs
tYl^/rde^ b'iSetP ©t) pwooca bon
P^i'Te'frtSeci
SeCteKW
lessorc-n'cz^ <Y]ardlojor.as q fC'Jx/W}S q. o-P 'irs^' d&
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner's trial attorney rendered constitutionally ineffective assistance by pursuing a defense that was patently untenable and doomed to fail
Docket Entries
2023-05-30
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/25/2023.
2023-05-03
Waiver of right of respondent Illinois to respond filed.
2023-04-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 30, 2023)
Attorneys
Derrick D. Hayes
Derrick D. Hayes — Petitioner
Illinois