No. 22-7405
Earl C. Handfield, II v. Bobbi Jo Salamon, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Rockview, et al.
IFP
Tags: brady-v-maryland counsel-performance due-process federal-courts legal-burden prejudice prosecutorial-misconduct strickland-v-washington
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. DOES BRADY V MARYLAND LAW WARRANT CLARIFICATION DUE TO FEDERAL COURTS ADDING A COUNSEL PERFORMANCE' PRONG TO THE BRADY ANALYSIS WHICH CONFUSES THE LAW WITH STRICKLAND V WASHINGTON AND INCREASES THE BURDEN OF SHOWING PREJUDICE?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does Brady v Maryland law warrant clarification due to federal courts adding a 'counsel-performance' prong to the Brady analysis which confuses the law with Strickland v Washington and increases the burden of showing prejudice?
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-01-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 30, 2023)
Attorneys
Earl C. Handfield
Earl C. Handfield II — Petitioner