1. Did the State Court proceedings afford Due Process and Equal Protection of Laws under the Fifth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Supreme Court? By rejecting a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus where Petitioner is being illegally detained simply because claimant cannot afford to hire an attorney to represent the action filed in state court. In violation of this Court's ruling in Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963)

2. Question of Great Public Importance subject to reoccurrence if not answered by Supreme Court which keeps rejecting review

Did the State Court proceedings afford Due Process and Equal Protection of Laws under the Fifth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment?