1. Whether extending the narrowly construed collateral order doctrine of Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. 337 U.S. 541 (1949), to all district court transportation orders is justified?

2. Whether courts are required to construe 18 U.S.C. § 3599 in a manner consistent with this Court's pronouncements in Ayestas and McFarland?

3. Whether a federal circuit court of appeals has the authority to implicitly amend 18 U.S.C. § 3599 by failing to give effect to every clause or word of the statute?

Whether the district court had jurisdiction to order transportation for medical testing in a clemency case