Whether United States v. Jackson, 36 F.4th 1294 (11th Cir. 2022) was wrongly decided by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, when it stated that Appellant's Florida state priors for armed career offender status, regarding Florida state § 893.13(a)(1), which removed ioflupane from its state Controlled Substance Act and the Federal Register (2015 for the Federal Register and in 2018 for the Florida state Controlled Substance Act) statute

Whether the Florida state priors for career offender and armed career federal enhancement purposes stated when the Petitioner was arrested by the state for career and/or armed career purposes, or whether they started for enhancement purposes when the Petitioner was federally sentenced using these state priors for federal enhancement purposes, Petitioner states they start when he was federally enhanced.

Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals erred in its decision in United States v. Jackson