The USDC & USCA-9 denied Kulick's right to Due Process by NOT Addressing Clause "(5) Filing Of Magistrate Judge's Report And Recommendations Before This Court Dismisses This Case For Any Reasons"

1. Attorney at Law under the Rule of Law of the U.S. Constitution To Advise Whether or NOT this Contract valid or NOT?

2. The Contract Is Invalid since Kulick did NOT have been violated by National Security which sets it aside until that cured because National Security trumps when any part of this U.S. Constitution

3. Under the Rule of Law the U.S. Constitution has has been breached as to DUE Process & NOT having an Attorney at Law for "Advise". This renders NO trust, faith or confidence in this U.S. Constitution when its get this "trumps" as a result of National Security in the Prevailing, factual circumstance(s) that currently exist.

4. Kulick is NOT equal to be mandated by any Rules of any Court to be on the same level as an Attorney at Law, being in Pro Per status, that is NOT fair. The U.S. Constitution assures that anyone must be "equal" & treated to "fair". Which Kulick have been Denied by USDC & USCA-9 by their determinations against Kulick:

5. Opinion(s) decide one way or other what litigate prevails, however those "opinion(s) are NOT permanent-being subject to change. Which of re-consideration whether or NOT exists, will or will NOT have some kind of re-consideration in this case matter before this Court?

6. See page 5, will this Court provide a federal decision that will protect seniors that join & live-in condominiums & other common-interest developments from corrupt Board of Dirs. & their legal vendors & their insurance reps., et al?

The USDC & USCA-9 denied Kulick's right to Due Process by NOT Addressing Clause '(5) Filing Of Magistrate -Judge's Report And Recommendations Before This Court Dismisses This case, For Any Reasons