No. 22-7358

In Re Ronnie Dante Thomas

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2023-04-24
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: collateral-challenge due-process habeas-corpus juvenile-adjudication procedural-bar sentencing-enhancement sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2023-06-22
Question Presented (from Petition)

IS The U.S. Court of Appeals for The Sixth Circuit ("Sixth Circuit") Application of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)'s Procedural Bar To a Collateral Challenge To a Prior Juvenile Adjudication That Was Used To Enhance Sentence Where Petitioner Alleged That The Prior Juvenile Adjudication Was Procured In Violation Of The Sixth Amendment Right To Counsel/ In Violate U.S.C. § 2243's1. Law And Justice Mandate?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is the Sixth Circuit's application of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)'s procedural bar to a collateral challenge to a prior juvenile adjudication that was used to enhance a sentence where the petitioner alleged the prior adjudication was procured in violation of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel, in violation of 28 U.S.C. § 2243's law and justice mandate?

Docket Entries

2023-06-26
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/22/2023.
2023-03-22
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 24, 2023)

Attorneys

Ronnie Dante Thomas
Ronnie Dante Thomas — Petitioner