COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT THE U S
UNREASONABLY DENIED PETITIONER, DUE PROCESS OF
DUE PROCESS CLAUSE RIGHTS OF THE U.S.
AMENDS V AND XIV AND MICH. CONST. (1963)
U.S. DISTRICTI.
LAW AND
CONST .
ART I 5 17 BY AFFIRMING THE
COURTS DECISION TO NOT ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF
APPEALABILITY OF LEGALLY INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
A REASONABLE DOUBT THAT
COMMITTED THE OFFENSE OFTO PROVE BEYOND
QUANDRAIKO HAYES
ASSAULT WITH INTENT TO DO GREAT BODILY HARM LESS
THAN MURDER.

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
DUE PROCESSX X THE XJ S
UNREASONABLY DENIED PETITIONER,
CLAUSE RIGHTS AND RIGHTS TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE
OF COUNSEL OF THE U.S. CONST. AMENDS VI AND XIVI § 20 BY AFFIRMING 1963 ART.
COURTS DECISION. TO NOT ISSUE A
OF APPEALABILITY ECAUSE QUANDRAIKOAND MICH. CONST.
THE U.S. DIST.
CERTIFICATE
HAYES RECEIVED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL
DURING TRIAL.

THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
PETITIONER, DUE PROCESS
RIGHTS AND CRUEL AND UNUSUAL .PUNISHMENT
CONST. AMENDS XIV AND
1963 I § 16 BY AFFIRMING THE
DECISION TO NOT ISSUE AIII.
UNREASONABLY DENIED
CLAUSE
RESPECTIVELY OF THE U.S.
VIII, MICH. CONST.
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY , WHERE QUANDRAIKD
ENHANCED IN SENTENCE UNDER
BECAUSE NOTHAYES WAS IMPROPERLY
MICH. COMPLIED LAWS 769.12(1)(a),
ALL PRIOR OFFENSES COULD BE USED, RESULTING IN A
DISPROPORTIONATE SENTENCE.

OUANDRAIKO HAYES HAS DECIDED TO NOT
CONST .IV. PETITIONER,
PURSUE THE ISSUE
AMENDS VI AND XIV, MICH.
RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL.PERTAINING TO U.S.
CONST. 1 963 I § 20

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH
UNREASONABLY DENIED
AND MICH. CONST.
I & X,
COURT DECISION
OF APPEALABILITY ,
HAYES PRIOR CONVICTIONS OF AMENDED
COMPLIED LAWS 769.1 2 (1 ) (a) TO.THE
CIRCUIT
CONST .
CLAUSE RIGHTS ART.
DISTRICT
CERTIFICATE
QUANDRAIKD
LAWS UNDER MICH.
IMPOSE A MANDATORY 25 YEAR SENTENCE.V.PETITIONER, U.S.
1963 EX POST FACTO
BY AFFIRMING THE U.S.
TO NOT ISSUE A
BY ADMITTING

Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit unreasonably denied the petitioner's due-process, effective-assistance-of-counsel, cruel-and-unusual-punishment, and ex-post-facto rights